Bomb Threat Debate Nearly Causes City Council To Explode
Memphis

Weather
Logo
Serving This Community For 139 Years, Online Since 2001
 Front Page
 News
 People
 Sports
 Obituaries
 Editorials
 Classifieds
 Subscription
 Calendar
 Community Links
Search
 
Community Calendar
Entire Newspaper Online
Would you use a digital subscription, which would place a .pdf copy of every page of the newspaper on line?

Yes, but only if it was free with my subscription.
No
Yes, even if it meant a slight increase in the cost of my subscription.
Yes, I don't subscribe to the paper, but would subscribe to this online version.

February 8, 2007

Bomb Threat Debate Nearly Causes City Council To Explode

Just days after a fake bomb threat had forced the evacuation of Scotland County R-I High School, debate over handling of the situation nearly caused the Memphis City Council to explode.

A proposal to seek reimbursement from the threat issuer for the city’s added police expenses caused by the scare turned into a heated argument.

Mayor Roger Gosney told the council that he had requested City Marshal John Myers to compile a list of expenses occurred above and beyond the normal call of duty that evening. The mayor indicated he wished to have those expenses turned over to the prosecution in an effort to seek reimbursement as part of the legal penalty for the criminal act.

Alderman Lucas Remley voiced his opposition to the idea. He stated the juvenile responsible for the bomb scare, as well as the juvenile’s parents had suffered enough.

“Do you really think that is the right thing to do, the moral thing to do?” Remley asked Gosney.

The mayor responded, saying he honestly felt like it was the appropriate steps for the city to take to recoup the tax money wasted by the prank.

“Then you are not the man I thought you were,” was Remley’s response to the Mayor.

Alderman Brian Brush sided with Remley in opposition to the proposal. He stated that it is the police department’s duty to respond to such emergencies.

Gosney noted that this was not a natural disaster, but was a man-made waste of city funds. He noted that the city normally seeks restitution when vandals damage city property, comparing this case to such acts.

Alderman Chris Feeney stated he felt the city should pursue restitution from the individual. He stated he felt sorry for the juvenile and for the parents, but by failing to punish the person responsible for the crime, the city was allowing the juvenile to escape accountability for the actions. He stated that this sends the wrong message to juveniles and ultimately encourages similar actions because they are aware there are no repercussions for their actions.

Remley blamed Feeney and his newspaper, for publishing a news article about the incident. He said it was the newspaper publisher’s fault for glorifying the event in an effort to sell more papers and that the media was responsible for causing these types of incidents.

Feeney asked his fellow west ward alderman if he believed that the media should ignore such events and leave the public wondering why the high school ball game was suspended midstream and several hundred people were evacuated from the facility and the surrounding neighborhoods.

Ultimately Feeney returned the debate to point by offering a motion to submit the request for restitution to the prosecution in the case.

The motion died for a lack of a second.


Copyright © 2001
Memphis Democrat
121 South Main Street
Memphis MO 63555
Phone: 660-465-7016 -- Email: memdemoc@nemr.net